![]() ![]() Se ha evaluado el impacto económico de 9.039 EF realizadas en 51 centros de salud (2010-2013) mediante teleespirometría (TE) comparándose con el sistema habitual.Įl sistema de TE encarece el coste unitario de la EF (47,8 € vs. Avoiding poor quality, invalid LFTs generates savings that compensate for the increased costs of performing LFTs with TS, making it a cost-effective method.Įvaluar el impacto económico de un sistema de telemedicina en un sistema público de salud para la mejora de la calidad de las espirometrías (espirometrías forzadas ) en atención primaria. ![]() Healthcare costs consequently fall as the number of LFTs performed by TS rises. The cost-effectiveness analysis concludes that TS is 23% more expensive and 46% more effective. The increase in cost for good quality LFT performed using TS was €34,030 (2010) and €144,295 (2013), while the costs of poor quality tests fell by €15,525 (2010) and 70,627€ (2013). Total cost of TS was €431,974 (compared with €358,306€ for SS), generating an economic impact of €73,668 (2013). €39.70) (2013), but the quality of the TS procedure is superior (84% good quality, compared to 61% using the standard procedure). TS costs more per unit than SS (€47.80 vs. The economic impact of 9,039 LFTs performed in 51 health centers (2010-2013) using telespirometry (TS) compared to standard spirometry (SS) was studied. ![]() To evaluate the economic impact of a telemedicine procedure designed to improve the quality of lung function testing (LFT) in primary care in a public healthcare system, compared with the standard method. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
March 2023
Categories |